General information · This page is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before starting or stopping any supplement.
추냥 성분 탐정단 The Ingredient Files 한국어English

Glycerol

No concern foundHow grades are decided

With low acute toxicity and no concern for genotoxicity or carcinogenicity, EFSA concluded that no numerical intake limit is needed. There is, though, one thing of a different kind worth noting. The panel conservatively estimated the lowest dose producing an osmotic effect at 125 mg per kg of body weight per hour, and noted that infants and toddlers can reach that dose by drinking less than one 330 mL can of a flavoured drink. That is a response to the substance pulling water rather than to toxicity, which is why smaller bodies reach it first.

Claimed harm

Toxicity and carcinogenicity
D / None
General population
In 1981 the Scientific Committee for Food endorsed JECFA's 1976 conclusion of an intake limit 'not specified for man'. EFSA found that glycerol has low acute toxicity and that the local gastrointestinal irritation reported in some gavage studies was likely due to its hygroscopic and osmotic effects. There was no genotoxicity concern and no concern regarding carcinogenicity; the reproductive and prenatal developmental studies were too limited to conclude on reproductive toxicity, but no dose-related adverse effects were reported. None of the available animal studies identified an adverse effect.

PMID: 32625431

Digestive response from an osmotic effect
C / Minimal
Specific group (Infants and toddlers drinking flavoured beverages)
EFSA conservatively estimated the lowest oral dose of glycerol required to produce an osmotic effect at 125 mg per kg of body weight per hour, and noted that infants and toddlers can be exposed to that dose by drinking less than one 330 mL can of a flavoured drink. This is a transient response to the substance drawing water rather than a toxic effect, and in the same opinion the panel concluded there is no safety concern at the refined exposure assessment for the reported uses. What remains is simply that the lighter the body, the larger the same can becomes as a dose.

PMID: 32625431

Impurities remaining from manufacture
C / Minimal
General population
A 2022 follow-up opinion assessed impurities separately, to support an amendment of the specifications. Based on actual levels in the commercial additive, the panel concluded that the EU limits for four toxic elements (arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium) should be lowered, and recommended setting a numerical limit for acrolein. Potential exposure to free 3-monochloropropanediol at the specification limit of 0.1 mg/kg was judged not to give rise to a health concern. It also recommended redefining the additive as obtained only from vegetable oils and fats and purified through distillation and other clean-up steps. In short, what needs managing is manufacturing quality rather than the substance itself.

PMID: 35770238

The conclusion is that no numerical daily intake limit is needed. JECFA's 1976 'not specified' was endorsed by the Scientific Committee for Food in 1981, and the 2017 re-evaluation reached the same conclusion.

Journal quotations are checked character by character against the original. Quotations from Korean MFDS documents are outside that automated check and were verified by hand.

Sources

Each source shows its one-line summary and key summary up front. Expand the collapsed section to read the original abstract. Every citation is verified by re-resolving through the API.

PMID 32625431 Re-evaluation of glycerol (E 422) as a food additive Agency re-evaluation opinion · EFSA Journal, 2017 No numerical intake limit needed. But infants can reach the osmotic-effect dose (125 mg/kg per hour) on under 330 mL of a flavoured drink.

Key summary

An EFSA Panel opinion re-evaluating glycerol (E 422). In 1981 the Scientific Committee for Food endorsed JECFA's 1976 conclusion of an intake limit 'not specified for man'. Acute toxicity is low, and local gastrointestinal irritation in some gavage studies was attributed to hygroscopic and osmotic effects. There was no genotoxicity or carcinogenicity concern, and while the reproductive and prenatal developmental studies were limited, no dose-related adverse effects were reported. The panel conservatively estimated the lowest oral dose producing an osmotic effect at 125 mg/kg per hour and noted that infants and toddlers can be exposed to it on less than one 330 mL can of a flavoured drink. The conclusion is no numerical intake limit and no safety concern at the refined exposure assessment, with the added condition that manufacturing must not yield genotoxic and carcinogenic residuals at a level giving a margin of exposure below 10,000.

Show original abstract
The ANS Panel provides a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of glycerol (E 422) used as a food additive. In 1981, the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) endorsed the conclusion from the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) in 1976 of 'acceptable daily intake (ADI) for man not specified'. The Panel concluded that glycerol has low acute toxicity and that local irritating effects of glycerol in the gastrointestinal tract reported in some gavage studies was likely due to hygroscopic and osmotic effects of glycerol. Glycerol did not raise concern with respect to genotoxicity and was of no concern with regard to carcinogenicity. Reproductive and prenatal developmental studies were limited to conclude on reproductive toxicity but no dose-related adverse effects were reported. None of the animal studies available identified an adverse effect for glycerol. The Panel conservatively estimated the lowest oral dose of glycerol required for therapeutic effect to be 125 mg/kg bw per hour and noted that infants and toddlers can be exposed to that dose by drinking less than the volume of one can (330 mL) of a flavoured drink. The Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical ADI and no safety concern regarding the use of glycerol (E 422) as a food additive at the refined exposure assessment for the reported uses. The Panel also concluded that the manufacturing process of glycerol should not allow the production of a food additive, which contains genotoxic and carcinogenic residuals at a level which would result in a margin of exposure below 10,000. The Panel recommended modification of the EU specifications for E 422. The Panel also recommended that more information on uses and use levels and analytical data should be made available to the Panel. ※ The abstract text as collected and stored via the API by the pipeline. The key summary is written based solely on this text.
View original ↗
PMID 35770238 Follow-up of the re-evaluation of glycerol (E 422) as a food additive Agency follow-up opinion · EFSA Journal, 2022 Impurity assessment. Recommends lowering the limits for arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium and setting a numerical limit for acrolein.

Key summary

A follow-up to the 2017 re-evaluation addressing the data gaps identified, to support an amendment of the specifications. The panel assessed the risk from undesirable impurities present in E 422. Based on actual levels in the commercial additive it concluded that the EU maximum limits for four toxic elements (arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium) should be lowered, and recommended setting a numerical limit for acrolein. Potential exposure to free 3-monochloropropanediol at the specification limit of 0.1 mg/kg was judged not to raise a health concern. It also recommended redefining E 422 as obtained only from vegetable oils and fats and subjected to distillation and other clean-up steps, and concluded that the technical data support amending the specifications.

Show original abstract
Glycerol (E 422) was re-evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow-up to that assessment, in this opinion, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) addresses the data gaps identified to support an amendment of the EU specifications for E 422 in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The Panel performed a risk assessment of undesirable impurities present in E 422. The Panel concluded that the maximum limits in the EU specifications for the four toxic elements (arsenic, lead, mercury and cadmium) should be lowered based on actual levels in the commercial food additive E 422. The Panel recommended setting a numerical limit value for acrolein in the specifications for E 422. The potential exposure to free 3-monochloropropanediol at the maximum limit of 0.1 mg/kg, as laid out in the specifications for E 422, does not give rise to a health concern. The Panel recommended to consider modifying the definition of E 422 in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 indicating that E 422 is obtained only from vegetable oils and fats and undergoes purification processes that involve distillation, and other clean up steps to obtain refined glycerol. Overall, the Panel concluded that the technical data provided support an amendment of the specifications for glycerol (E 422). ※ The abstract text as collected and stored via the API by the pipeline. The key summary is written based solely on this text.
View original ↗

Revision history

The full history of when and how this ingredient's evidence changed (git commits = proof of trust).