General information · This page is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before starting or stopping any supplement.
추냥 성분 탐정단 The Ingredient Files 한국어English

Modified starch

No concern foundHow grades are decided

The name 'chemically modified starch' is what makes people wary of this one. EFSA's re-evaluation of twelve of them at once reads plainly. It is not absorbed intact in the body but is substantially hydrolysed by intestinal enzymes and then fermented by the gut microbiota. Rats fed up to 31,000 mg per kg of body weight per day showed no treatment-related effects relevant to human risk assessment, and people tolerated single doses up to 25,000 mg. The panel concluded there is no safety concern at the reported uses for the general population and no need for a numerical intake limit.

Claimed harm

Safety concern at reported use levels
D / None
General population
EFSA re-evaluated twelve modified starches authorised in the EU (E 1404, 1410, 1412, 1413, 1414, 1420, 1422, 1440, 1442, 1450, 1451, 1452) together. JECFA and the Scientific Committee for Food had both allocated an intake limit of 'not specified'. Using a read-across approach the panel judged the short- and long-term toxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity data adequate, and in silico analysis indicated no genotoxic concern. Rats fed very high levels, up to 31,000 mg/kg per day, showed no treatment-related effects relevant for human risk assessment. The panel concluded there is no safety concern at the reported uses for the general population and no need for a numerical intake limit.

PMID: 32625282

Digestive reaction when swallowed by people
D / None
General population
In people, modified starches are not absorbed intact. Intestinal enzymes hydrolyse them substantially and the gut microbiota then ferments them. For one of them (E 1450), single doses up to 25,000 mg per person were well tolerated. For scale, combined exposure to E 1404 through E 1451 at the 95th percentile of the refined assessment for the general population was up to 3,053 mg per kg of body weight per day, and exposure to E 1452 among food supplement consumers only was up to 22.1 mg.

PMID: 32625282

The conclusion is that no numerical daily intake limit is needed. JECFA and the Scientific Committee for Food had both allocated 'not specified', and the 2017 re-evaluation reached the same conclusion.

Journal quotations are checked character by character against the original. Quotations from Korean MFDS documents are outside that automated check and were verified by hand.

Sources

Each source shows its one-line summary and key summary up front. Expand the collapsed section to read the original abstract. Every citation is verified by re-resolving through the API.

PMID 32625282 Re-evaluation of oxidised starch (E 1404), monostarch phosphate (E 1410), distarch phosphate (E 1412), phosphated distarch phosphate (E 1413), acetylated distarch phosphate (E 1414), acetylated starch (E 1420), acetylated distarch adipate (E 1422), hydroxypropyl starch (E 1440), hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate (E 1442), starch sodium octenyl succinate (E 1450), acetylated oxidised starch (E 1451) and starch aluminium octenyl succinate (E 1452) as food additives Agency re-evaluation opinion · EFSA Journal, 2017 Twelve re-evaluated together. No effects in rats up to 31,000 mg/kg, single human doses of 25,000 mg tolerated. No numerical intake limit needed.

Key summary

An EFSA Panel opinion, requested by the European Commission, re-evaluating twelve modified starches. In humans they are not absorbed intact but are substantially hydrolysed by intestinal enzymes and then fermented by the gut microbiota. A read-across approach found the short- and long-term toxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity data adequate, and in silico analysis raised no genotoxic concern. Rats fed up to 31,000 mg/kg per day showed no treatment-related effects relevant for human risk assessment, and people tolerated single doses up to 25,000 mg. The conclusion is no safety concern at reported uses for the general population and no need for a numerical intake limit.

Show original abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of 12 modified starches (E 1404, E 1410, E 1412, E 1413, E 1414, E 1420, E 1422, E 1440, E 1442, E 1450, E 1451 and E 1452) authorised as food additives in the EU in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 and previously evaluated by JECFA and the SCF. Both committees allocated an acceptable daily intake (ADI) 'not specified'. In humans, modified starches are not absorbed intact but significantly hydrolysed by intestinal enzymes and then fermented by the intestinal microbiota. Using the read-across approach, the Panel considered that adequate data on short- and long-term toxicity and carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity are available. Based on in silico analyses, modified starches are considered not to be of genotoxic concern. No treatment-related effects relevant for human risk assessment were observed in rats fed very high levels of modified starches (up to 31,000 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day). Modified starches (e.g. E 1450) were well tolerated in humans up to a single dose of 25,000 mg/person. Following the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives, the Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for the use of modified starches as food additives at the reported uses and use levels for the general population and that there is no need for a numerical ADI. The combined exposure to E 1404-E 1451 at the 95th percentile of the refined (brand-loyal) exposure assessment scenario for the general population was up to 3,053 mg/kg bw per day. Exposure to E 1452 for food supplement consumers only at the 95th percentile was up to 22.1 mg/kg bw per day. ※ The abstract text as collected and stored via the API by the pipeline. The key summary is written based solely on this text.
View original ↗

Revision history

The full history of when and how this ingredient's evidence changed (git commits = proof of trust).